"Boys in Our Books"…

…we're keeping our name but expanding our offerings!

REVIEW: “Maurice” by E.M. Forster

ABOUT:

The work of an exceptional artist working close to the peak of his powers.” —Christopher Lehmann-Haupt, New York Times

Set in the elegant Edwardian world of Cambridge undergraduate life, this story by a master novelist introduces us to Maurice Hall when he is fourteen. We follow him through public school and Cambridge, and on into his father’s firm, Hill and Hall, Stock Brokers. In a highly structured society, Maurice is a conventional young man in almost every way, “stepping into the niche that England had prepared for him”: except that his is homosexual.

Written during 1913 and 1914, after an interlude of writer’s block following the publication of Howards End, and not published until 1971, Maurice was ahead of its time in its theme and in its affirmation that love between men can be happy. “Happiness,” Forster wrote, “is its keynote….In Maurice I tried to create a character who was completely unlike myself or what I supposed myself to be: someone handsome, healthy, bodily attractive, mentally torpid, not a bad businessman and rather a snob. Into this mixture I dropped an ingredient that puzzles him, wakes him up, torments him and finally saves him.”

 

REVIEW:

I have never read anything by E.M. Forster, I am not well-versed in English literature classics and I haven’t watched the movie, but I still got an idea of what this story would be : a Tess d’Ubervillesque  love story with a happy ending and a young, gay, dishevelled and cavorting Hugh Grant.

If by any chance you have the same idea, forget it.

“Maurice” is not a romantic drama, and if it’s what you’re looking for, you’re going to be disappointed. I was not. Besides the fact that it was rather a relief, I can’t describe my experience better than comparing it to a growing relationship. The more I read it, the more I liked it; and even though I never disliked it, my initial temperate appreciation grew until I finished it with a kindle-hugging feeling.

My main reserve was (and nevertheless still is) about the writing style that I found rigid like a starched collar, at first. However, there is also a dry humour in this same writing that gives a deliciously ironic lighting to dramatic scenes and sketches wonderful portraits. Rigid and repressed, yet sharp and funny. It’s Forster’s humour that made a dent in my reserve and nudged me to pay attention and reach the emotions lying under his style. For all its restraint, it is never detached. Among other things, I loved his ability to tell a love story, touch me deeply and make me root for the  HEA in half a sentence. Some of his quotes are still resonating.

In the same way, this story is about Maurice, whom I didn’t dislike but didn’t like either, at first. I liked how E.M. Forster brushed his portrait, but I found that it was hard to grow attached to him even though it wasn’t really a problem for me. Maurice is a bit of a snob without being totally insufferable, he seems a little low on the uptake without being totally stupid, he can be a domestic tyrant without being totally mean. He is average without being ordinary.  Maurice doesn’t entertain intellectual considerations about homosexuality or love or life; he is tuned to sensations and feelings, may they be desires or longings, happiness or pain, and he doesn’t shy away from them. Somehow, his body and his heart precede his mind, and because he is fundamentally honest, they jolt him into reflecting,  learning, then making choices. That’s how E.M. Forster develops his character and stays true to his nature all along, with the best of results. Not only does Maurice develop as a character, but he grows as a person. You are so going to cheer him! It doesn’t have to be easy though; what would we hold our breath for, otherwise?

I’ve read in Forster’s final note that a friend of his found that the book dated and could only “have a period interest” for modern readers. It definitely reflects its time and it is quaint, but it is not a museum piece. It’s a beautiful journey toward owning one’s own soul with the underlying idea that if love is a beautiful emotion, the path toward happy ending is through growing into oneself. That is not out-dated.

It will probably not be your cup of tea if you’re dead set on forefront romance and lots of emotion and sex, but definitely give it a shot if you like character-driven stories. Not a romantic drama, but still holding its fair share of dramatic twists and romantic moments, this book was nothing I expected it to be. I wasn’t hard into it from the get go, but I ended up loving it and I am attached to the journey that brought me there.

 

RATING: 4 STARS

 

BOOK INFO:

Title: Maurice
Author: E.M. Forster
Publisher: W. W. Norton & Company (paperback)
Pages:   256 pages
Release Date:  December 17th 2005 (first published 1971)
Purchase links : Amazon

4 comments on “REVIEW: “Maurice” by E.M. Forster

  1. gaycrow
    February 19, 2015

    It’s good to see a review of a “classic” book.

    I’m almost embarrassed to say that I struggled with the book, and gave up before the end. But I love the movie, it’s one of my all time favourites. (I think it sticks pretty much to the original story, with slight changes.) I bought the special edition DVD, with all the extras, which makes fascinating viewing.

    Like

    • ilhem3606
      February 19, 2015

      I still have to watch the movie and I’m suspicious about the slight changes, but I definitely will. I can see why you struggled, the writing style can really put you off. But maybe it wasn’t your problem? Anyway, I feel about it like I would feel about someone I barely noticed, then got to know better, then ended up loving. All smitten and happily surprised.:)

      Like

    • Ami
      February 20, 2015

      I also watched the movie and loved it so much. There was a time where I tried to watch as many as LGBT movie with happy ending that I could find, and Maurice is one of them. I don’t think I will read this book, though, being a non-native English I struggled with “classics” language :(

      Like

      • ilhem3606
        February 20, 2015

        The language is not difficult. It’s more that emotions are repressed and the focus is on Maurice’s coming of age.

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on February 19, 2015 by in Historical, Reviewer: Ilhem and tagged , .

Follow Us On Twitter

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Categories

Archives

%d bloggers like this: